新書推薦:

《
博物馆学辞典 博物馆学核心工具书,权威专家联合编纂,理论与实践的指南!
》
售價:HK$
270.6

《
战时的博弈:教宗庇护十二世、墨索里尼与希特勒的秘史(理想国译丛075)
》
售價:HK$
162.8

《
明亡清兴 1618—1662年的战争、外交与博弈
》
售價:HK$
74.8

《
北大版康德三大批判
》
售價:HK$
308.0

《
建安 统一北方之战(201—207)
》
售價:HK$
53.9

《
什么是权力(一本讲透权力逻辑的政治学入门佳作,一次从学术到生活的认知升级)
》
售價:HK$
66.0

《
债务自由:远离债务困境
》
售價:HK$
86.9

《
清代满汉关系史:全三册
》
售價:HK$
547.8
|
| 內容簡介: |
Despite the increasing attention to EFL teachers'' continuing professional development (CPD) in China, few studies'' have examined the inquiry processes and outcomes of these EFL teachers as they conduct group discussions to meet individual needs for their professional development. The purpose of such discussions is to develop a model for advocating learner-centeredness, autonomy, agency, reflection, collaboration, and networking with others, all of which constitute a still uncommon practice in Chinese universities.
來源:香港大書城megBookStore,http://www.megbook.com.hk Grounded in activity theory (AT), in addition to published literature on the Collaborative Professional Inquiry (CPI) model, the present research explored an intra-department CPI model by pursuing a close examination of an EFL teacher participants'' group activity for professional development at one Chinese university over the course of a semester.Despite the increasing attention to EFL teachers'' continuing professional development (CPD) in China, few studies'' have examined the inquiry processes and outcomes of these EFL teachers as they conduct group discussions to meet individual needs for their professional development. The purpose of such discussions is to develop a model for advocating learner-centeredness, autonomy, agency, reflection, collaboration, and networking with others, all of which constitute a still uncommon practice in Chinese universities.
Grounded in activity theory (AT), in addition to published literature on the Collaborative Professional Inquiry (CPI) model, the present research explored an intra-department CPI model by pursuing a close examination of an EFL teacher participants'' group activity for professional development at one Chinese university over the course of a semester.
I present a case study of a group of Chinese EFL teachers who taught a College English course (4 focal participants and 12 non-focal participants). Sources of data included questionnaires, interviews, group discussions, reflection papers, QQ exchanges, and documents (reading materials, school documents, department files, my field notes, research journals, and students'' assignments). My analyses demonstrate the processes of interaction and negotiation in the course of group discussions, influential factors that facilitate or constrain the model of this group activity, and strengths and weaknesses of this model for EFL teachers'' professional development.
|
|